Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satisfaction slip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfaction slip

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Draftified by Jolielover, declined at AfC by me, moved back to mainspace by creator without any improvement. Not properly sourced. I know these cards exist but I couldn't find anything relevant when I searched "satisfaction slip". ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sourcing is primary in the article... I can find mentions of satisfaction slipping, but nothing about this piece of paper included in snacks. Does not seem to be widely used as there are no mentions of it. Oaktree b (talk) 13:17, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An address to write to for concerns or comments is WP:MILL for any consumer product, just in this case they don't have room on the packaging so they just print it inside the package on the cardboard the food is on. Nothing of note here. Nathannah • 📮 16:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could only find one source actually mentioning the thing discussed in the article, and it is only a passing mention. Fails WP:GNG. jolielover♥talk 17:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just because something exists does not mean that it is notable, this is one of those cases. A single source is not enough for WP:GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 11:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.