- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Satyadev chada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Vanity/spam page. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm seeing no evidence of independent notability here. If kept, it would probably serve only as a vanity/spam page, as indicated by User:MikeWazowski above. -- WikHead (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agree with nom, fails WP:GNG--DBigXray 13:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable independent sources, fails WP:GNG. WWGB (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.