- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ScaleDB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No substantial independent secondary sources can be found, fails notability. Created by a single purpose account with edits almost exclusively about ScaleDB. -- intgr [talk] 20:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reference review. User Go77edit added 3 references to the article, thanks.
- "ScaleDB aims to take MySQL to new heights". The 451 Group. — paper behind paywall. Not clear if this is independent -- may be ordered/paid for by ScaleDB? Does anyone know?
- "ScaleDB Presents the Revenge of the Pointer". DBMS2. — looks like a good source.
- "Horizontally Scalable NewSQL Database: ScaleDB, almost like Oracle RAC using MySQL". Unbreakable Cloud. — not a substantial article. The bullet list comes from ScaleDB themselves ("According to ScaleDB, it offers"), so largely not original either.
-- intgr [talk] 09:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero independent sources. --Randykitty (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.