Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scale Expanding Cosmos
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 07:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable theory by a non-notable engineer (just tagged that nn-bio); no interest in this theory beyond the publications of the author. Sdedeo (tips) 01:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. There are some Google hits for the author, but notability is very weak for him and I certainly don't see any reason to have a whole article for one of his theories. This is vanity. Aplomado talk 01:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely agree with the above. The theory is completely unknown in the cosmology and particle theory community. To include it in Wikipedia gives it a notability it hasn't earned on its own. RE 05:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for double non-notability. --Coredesat 07:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --ScienceApologist 10:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR's original intention--As Jimbo Wales said, "The phrase "original research" originated primarily as a practical means to deal with physics cranks, of which of course there are a number on the Web." Adambiswanger1 19:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Richardcavell
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.