- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was duh, it's BJAODN time! =D - Mailer Diablo 20:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe BJAODN or just Delete, seems to be attempt at original humor Chris the speller 03:43, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN WAvegetarian (talk) (email) (contribs) 06:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It gets 5 stars, so that means it has no worth at all. Geogre 14:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:-O — Haeleth Talk 23:00, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN Obviously a joke, no encyclopedic value. --kralahome 00:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not good enough for BJAODN--MONGO 03:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN and then delete Denni ☯ 03:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN. I give them five (5) for effort. Peeper 10:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN per Pperos. Stifle 22:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.