Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scanners Discotheque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 22:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scanners Discotheque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews and google search mainly reveals directory and mirror listings. little chance of article improvement given that it's now closed and it's own website is dead. LibStar (talk) 06:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unimportant disco club. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now. I do believe this article is notable, but as it it now it has been lacking good sources for 2 years and is badly written. Dentren | ^Talk 11:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this nightclub. Joe Chill (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.