- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. In view of the improvements, esp by Chiswick Chap, I'm happy to snow close Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Scarlet Harlets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unsourced and no evidence at all of notability. Creator has obvious COI Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - there is no problem at all with notability, which is a function of what has been written in books, journals and newspapers, and not of what has been omitted by Wikipedia editors. I have added six independent published sources as well as the company's website. There should be no trouble finding reviews also, I'll look out one or two for you. This is a well-known, distinguished company of actors, and if I'm allowed an adjective or two for once, powerfully led, funny, energetic, creative, and invariably thought-provoking. But don't believe me, read the sources. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep article, per Chiswick Chap, but change the titel to the current name Scarlet Theatre, with a redircet from Scarlet Herlets. Thanks for adding the references. Martinogk (talk) 03:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Chiswick Chap, and rename per Martinogk. Bravo to Chiswick Chap for outstanding referencing, including archived references and Gbooks. Norvoid (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I see no COI and good sourcing. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.