Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoolhandbook.blogspot.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. DS 13:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Removed without comment. a non-notable blog that fails WP:WEB Lorty 01:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -ScotchMB 01:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails also WP:CITE --Shane (talk/contrib) 01:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, hosted on Blogspot usually translates to failing WP:WEB. Look at the three entries as well... ooh. WP:SNOW candidate. --Kinu t/c 02:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, not much of an article. -Royalguard11Talk 02:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not your blogvertising service. -- MrDolomite | Talk 03:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable blog. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Bribe some one to rip your homework up when you're not home. Why, that's clever AND hilarious! Not. george 06:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Rubbish!! Why not speedy delete?
- Delete with fire. Then put the ashes in an old mayonaisse jar, roll the jar up in a carpet, throw the carpet into a river and launch the river into the sun. Repeat as needed per WP:SPAM et al. WilyD 13:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per MrDolomite. --DarkAudit 13:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Numerous notable blogs are on blogspot--Atrios.blogspot.com, SusanPolgar.blogspot.com, etc. But this isn't one of them. Phr (talk) 14:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it in a fire with great prejudice. Dark Shikari 17:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Double extra delete. Plus everything written above. Mithridates 18:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Funny, but Non-notable blog. (I went to the website and it cracked me up!) Chipka 20:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 21:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The blog actually does get a lot of visitors. I guess not enough. 11kowrom 21:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Tuspm(C | @) 22:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --awh (Talk) 02:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This looks like a snowball --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 06:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --nkayesmith 07:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.