- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ScienceSoft Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company, no coverage in third-party sources. Fails WP:CORP. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 14:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertising for an IT consulting business. When the lead paragraph tells us that the most important things to know about this business are "ISO 9001:2000" certification and "Microsoft Gold Certified Partner", it seems unlikely to be notable; and sure enough, Google News finds only press releases announcing routine transactions. (Hint: anything that says "leading Eastern European IT outsourcing company" isn't an independent source.) - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD § A7: yet another development of artificial intelligence and semantic processing solutions company with the only attempt to claim notability via listing partnerships with some other ISVs. The company can't be notable if it lacks notable products! That not to mention the complete lack of reliable independent sources covering this ISV. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.