Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science Foo Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. AKRadecki 19:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Science Foo Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Makes no claim of notability, doesn't even explain what it's about & may be an advertisement or OR. Cheers, Delete - Spawn Man 06:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems there are other articles like this out there. The overall article seems okay (Foo Camp), but others like the Kiwi Foo Camp etc, read like an OR advertisement & certainly didn't get any airtime on the news etc here in New Zealand. (I live in New Zealand & have never heard of the Kiwi Foo camp). If anyone else sees fit, those articles could be included as well... Spawn Man 06:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but needs much work. JJL 14:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable enough, but this article like most on wikipedia needs a lot of work. Decoratrix 17:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the page in an effort to try and clarify what SciFoo is a bit better. Hope it helps a little... Andrew Walkingshaw 15:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Science Foo camp deserves its own small entry, but more material is required. Perhaps after camp #2 this year that will happen. dsingh 23:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.