Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science future

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Delete - Clearcut to me: "Acurate prediction of the future has not yet gone to print."... nor will this article. ++Lar: t/c 21:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete neologism from unpublished book. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing to support the phrase at all. Author doesn't google at all. Fan1967 21:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism, violates WP:NOT a crystal ball per se. M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 22:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. DarthVader 22:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — can't we speedy this somehow? — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.