- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Scot Hacker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:AUTHOR in my view. That's a somewhat subjective guideline given that the biographies of some authors have been kept per some Wikipedia editors' personal assessment of point 3 in that guideline, despite lack of significant independent coverage, so I'm sure some will disagree here as well. Pcap ping 01:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 01:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Point 3 in WP:AUTHOR says that the well-known work has to have "been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Without any sources to prove that part, I don't see the article fulfilling that criterion. On top of that, this article is a whole lot of linkspam and reads like a fan site or something. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.