Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott's Factory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scott's Factory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the three references in the article (two independent, one just reprinting "official records" so not really helping for notability), I don't see what this building, this factory, is supposed to be notable for. If the skirmish is notable, then that should have an article, not the building. Google searches for more info from reliable sources did not yield any good indication why this topic is notable enough for a Wikipedia article: [1], [2] Fram (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- It is too stubby at present, but that is no reason for deletion. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- And what is your argument for keeping it? The deletion is not suggested for being too stubby, but for not being notable, so it would help if you would address that argument and not a strawman. Fram (talk) 08:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the factory building fails GNG. It played no notable role in the Civil War skirmish.Blue Riband► 23:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, there wasn't a battle/skirmish in this area worth noting, just the enemy encountering each other in that random ___location. Secret ^account 00:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.