Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotty Doesn't Know

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to EuroTrip, which I have done. Sandstein 15:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scotty Doesn't Know (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Song is not notable enough for its own article. -Nv8200p talk 03:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to EuroTrip. A joke song from an extraordinarily unmemorable movie. No need for its own article. Wavy G 03:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to EuroTrip per above. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Wavy G, it's worth a section in Eurotrip but not an article of it's own. James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 05:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• See previous AfD. --Rory096 05:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to EuroTrip, not independently notable but should be mentioned as part of the movie. Seraphimblade 10:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect per the above. ← ANAS ^Talk? 20:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as before, this is it's second AfD. It's a notable song on its own. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment While this is true, the previous result was no consensus, not a keep, so nothing wrong with putting it back after some time's elapsed. Seraphimblade 23:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure. Since nothing's changed, however...it's still a noteworthy song on its own. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question. How is the song notable? The article makes to claims to notability. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 01:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've been frustratingly unable to find any reliable sources to confirm notability. However, I have found several blog entries, [1] [2] [3], indicating they charted (Pop 100 for July 2006, #53; 2005 ringtones, #19) and were also one of the first independent bands to chart in the age of downloadable music. Billboard's search engine will confirm they charted, though not which position.--Kchase T 05:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & Redirect. While I've contributed to this article over time, it really isn't notable on it's own — not that anybody's been able to show by way of WP:RS, that is. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 13:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep separately per Badlydrawnjeff.--Kchase T 23:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 01:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mutterings. You can't vote twice THOR -- the other editors don't appreciate your eccentricities like I do. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I believe the song made its way onto a few charts upon being relesed --T-rex 19:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.