- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 21:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ScreenJot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ambiguous spam, could be spam, but doesn't meet G11. Only ghits are download sites. Ipatrol (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. I doubt that this is spam because it is free software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:Advertisement Dr. Szląchski (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep:Factual Product DescriptionJohnrobinsn (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the lack of reliable sources. Searches on Google Books and Google News Archive return no results. This software fails WP:N.
The company that produces this free software, LiquidThought, also fails the notability guidelines so a merge cannot be done.
I agree with Joe Chill that this article is not spam. It is written neutrally and does not contain weasel words. The only problem here is notability, not promotion. Cunard (talk) 08:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.