- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Screentoaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software; the PROD was deleted, so i've moved it here. Ironholds 07:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Ironholds 07:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. About as bad as they come, not notable, no references, hardly any context. Equendil Talk 12:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as the author just blanked the page. Wyatt Riot (talk) 18:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 20:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any source to make this notable. VG ☎ 20:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Currently this is a one-sentence definitional statement and does not assert notability. -- SockpuppetSamuelson (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete non-notable software. Neptune5000 (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.