Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrollback

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scrollback

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable chat service. Sources are self-published, listings, blog mentions, and a yourstory PR "article" (the YS author is a yoga teacher/writer and former corporate lawyer). Google search found no independent in-depth coverage from reliable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see no obvious better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable source.JugniSQ (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I don't feel too confident here. There aren't any great sources via the usual search links, but Scrollback is a generic term, it's an Indian startup, and we certainly could be missing things. The fact that one of the sources (yourstory.com) is blacklisted is also concerning (looking into that). WP:NSOFT suggests that "it is reasonable to allow relatively informal sources for free and open-source software, if significance can be shown," but we need more sources. If Priyanka_Nag or others can provide those, perhaps something more can be done here. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 00:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. When the Git commits are listed as a "source", you know you're not dealing with notable software. Guy (Help!) 00:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.