- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:02, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In the light of the results of Googling this word, and in the absence of any cites given, this looks like orginal research at best, and a hoax at worst. Propose: Delete unless a cite is given and independently confirmed. -- The Anome 15:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clumsy hoax of a neologism. --Fire Star 15:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - join the crusade against bad portmanteaux --MacRusgail 20:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism. Flowerparty■ 22:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I condemneth this neohoaxism to Wiki-Hell!!! BD2412 talk 03:40, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. Jtmichcock 21:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. BD2412, that's a nice bright yellow nightmare you have over there. :) --Jacquelyn Marie 18:46, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no, or very little, mercy. Psora 05:38, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.