- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Original research. The Wiktionary definition for the term indicates it is only a pejorative. The article's extensive description of a demographic, or subculture (as chav), by this name is prima facie unverifiable. Alksub 01:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is impossible to verify the contents of this article. A google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 02:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is the sad product of what happens when someone tries to write about a pejorative as though it were factual. Major NPOV issues as well. Calgary 02:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everything said above. — Wenli (contribs) 02:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong and snowball delete. Violates WP:NOR heavily, unverifiable.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 11:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. Worthless article that tells the reader nothing; has no place in an encyclopaedia. Sam Blacketer 16:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Opinion: funny how every sad individual who wanted this well written article deleted (using the spurious WP:IDL arguments) no longer edit on Wikipedia.81.141.61.151 (talk) 11:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.