Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrounge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Mandsford 21:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scrounge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable fictional character, unsourced. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources = no article therefore it has to go. Dwanyewest (talk) 04:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per no sources, Sadads (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WHAT THE EFFIN' HELL? I'm sorry, but this is insane. Why should we have an article on this guy? He had one fictional appearance, in an obscure 80's comic book, a bunch of cameos, and, uh.....that's it? ----Divebomb is not British 17:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
MERGE - He actually made other appearances after this, this article only mentions the first two, but this writeup is badly out of date as well as lacking sources. It should probably be merge to List of characters in Transformers comics. Mathewignash (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the deletes above. Black Kite should be commended for having the guts and patience to take on all this excessive transformerscruft. Reyk _YO! 09:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.