- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- SeaBubble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. No evidence that this product actually exists. The only independent reference confirms it is an idea, nothing more and the article speaks only of prototypes. Far,far too soon for this. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 15:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep – Meets GNG per a WP:BEFORE review of available sources. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. North America1000 14:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep plenty of independent sources WP:RS as indicated above by Northamerica1000. Pass WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.