- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seamless AB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find significant coverage for this company. —fetch·comms 20:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Like most publicly traded companies, there is enough coverage out there to make it notable. See WP:LISTED. --MelanieN (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, references are standard stock investor blurbs and press releases. I looked, but cannot find any significant coverage, as required by WP:LISTED. --Nuujinn (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.