- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SecoBackup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software, no independent reliable sources found. Declined speedy as spam (article edited since then to tone down). Cquan (after the beep...) 09:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Non-notable software, original editor has a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete = Not verifiable. A search of Google News shows no hits for any time period. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 19:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.