Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Foundation Consulting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second Foundation Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Microsoft IMPACT Award appears to provide only trivial coverage (i.e., it mentions their name) as well as being self-nominated and no reliable sources turned up by a gnews search. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Also advertising: implements large scale financial accounting and ERP solutions for clients ... To date their consulting expertise has been built on Microsoft Dynamics, Sage and Epicor software. A self-nomination for a non-notable award doesn't shouldn't even count as a showing of minimal importance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.