- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate wasSpeedy Delete, attack article. pschemp | talk 15:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef. Delete abakharev 21:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seond warning? Artw 21:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not so concerned with the definitional nature, but more the self-referential aspect of the article. A link to the google results of "second warnings" on wikipedia? Creative... yes, but it seems to be a thinly veiled POV attack. Maybe some of this information could have a home in the WP namespace, but it's probably already there. Irongargoyle 22:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Dictdef, I'm guessing a thinly veiled WP:POINT by a disgruntled vandal. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even a very good definition. I've heard the phrase used outside Wikipedia, but never with a denotation other than the expected one when combining the words second and warning. GassyGuy 01:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Oh, come on. SM247My Talk 03:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and improve. A self ref as much as Wikipedia is one.Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article cites no sources, and there is no evidence that there actually is a distinct concept of a "second warning" for there to be an encyclopaedia article about. The article is an unreferenced stub that has no potential for expansion. Looking at Special:Contributions/Tobias Conradi (especially this edit which preceded the creation of this article by two minutes and the same editor's subsequent creation of Wikipedia:Second warning) it appears clear that this was never intended to be an encyclopaedia article, but is a byproduct of a dispute. Delete. Uncle G 12:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Was created because I warned him for the second time about name calling and personal attacks. pschemp | talk 01:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.