Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Secos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any sources supporting the existence, let alone notability, of this OS. Article was previously nominated for deletion back in 2004: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SECOS, although the decision does not appear to have been closed. Article was speedy deleted in 2007 as a likely hoax. ThaddeusB (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreferenced software article of unclear notability. A search turns up no RS coverage. Article was created by a now-blocked SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 07:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Project is dead since 2004. Source code is gone; Server on fire. Single reference is a forum entry which may be conjecture since no one replied. Could be a hoax. No way to prove it. scope_creep talk 22:09 19 April 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.