Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Princesses
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Secret Princesses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a children's book series failing to meet WP:NBOOK. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as I found a single review. Nothing in Publishers Weekly or Gale Literature. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm a little surprised at the lack of coverage out there as a whole, to be honest. There's just not enough out there to establish notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.