- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete Mangojuicetalk 19:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cruddy list = very yes Soup Blazer 19:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral This list is quite poor, yes; however, I think that with a cleanup, and a little more context, it can be salvaged. --Porqin 20:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-encyclopedic list that tries to do what a category is supposed to do. (BTW, how could this have left off Big Mac's
tartersecret sauce?). Agent 86 21:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Comment: Agree with User:Porqin, this is a very confused list. Needs better definition, but could be a valid topic. No vote for now. JYolkowski // talk 22:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no way of knowing if this list could ever be completed. My test for an article is - 'Would anyone look it up here and expect to find it?'. In this case IMHO, no. BlueValour 04:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.