- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Secure-24 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of how this article might meet WP:CORP RadioFan (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. BJTalk 14:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it wasn't for the admin-objection, I'd say speedy. Meets the criterion A7 almost verbatim "An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 16:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Significance added as reference and included in text. Meets WP:CORP standards. Ccdsurfer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- It actually doesn't satisfy WP:CORP. The reference you added might constitute significant coverage, but I'm personally not convinced that it isn't a press release. Multiple references are generally required, minimum 2-3. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 17:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.