Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure-webconferencing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete since no one is going to shed a tear for this advert of adverts. Kimchi.sg 15:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising. They even put search keywords at the bottom to generate hits. Wikipedia is not a venue for you to promote your product and/or service. --Xrblsnggt 01:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Possibly the worst case of spam I have ever seen. The keywords section is truly ridiculous. Wickethewok 02:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm in favour of keeping as many articles as possible, but this would not be one of them per above reasons. -- Librarianofages 02:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It looks like an email sent by spammers to rip off someone. --Sbluen 02:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Spam essay. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - blatant spam - Peripitus (Talk) 02:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It can't be speedied for advertising, and it's not really spam (which would be speedyable), but it's a clear deletion guideline failure: a signed promo for a service. If it experienced a mysterious accident in the night, few would mourn, I'm sure. Geogre 02:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this a copyvio of something? It seems like it probably should be, though I don't find this essay on their website... Wickethewok 02:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I was hoping so, too. I think, unfortunately, it's an original come-on just for us. Either that or it's a copyvio of their e-mail spam sandwich or of their pamphlet. I think it may trip and fall down the stairs soon. Geogre 11:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Heheheh. Wickethewok 12:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I was hoping so, too. I think, unfortunately, it's an original come-on just for us. Either that or it's a copyvio of their e-mail spam sandwich or of their pamphlet. I think it may trip and fall down the stairs soon. Geogre 11:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this a copyvio of something? It seems like it probably should be, though I don't find this essay on their website... Wickethewok 02:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advertising. -- Gogo Dodo 05:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It looks like an essay to me, not an article.--Ageo020 06:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Essay, not article. -- Fairsing 06:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as what Ageo020 says. --Alex9891 (userpage) 11:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per crazy hard failure of WP:SPAM, WP:VAIN, WP:NOT, WP:OR and so forth... WilyD 12:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Vehement delete, ditto and etcetera. I hate anything that starts by telling me about a growing trend today. Smerdis of Tlön 14:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.