- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 00:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SecureWorks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced article with serious neutral point of view issues ("...has been growing rapidly enough...rapid countermeasure deployment...continued to expand...merger has exceeded expectations for synergy and financial results...significant contributor to the body of knowledge...") about potentially non-notable Atlanta-based security firm written by an "interactive marketing specialist with expertise in interactive media, search engine (SEO) optimization and web 2.0 marketing" who is "currently an interactive marketing manager for an for Atlanta-based security firm" -- samj inout 15:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Non-notable corporation, possibly spam. USA Today article is a one line trivial mention, the remainder of the "in the news" links are either blatently not third party sources or are very questionable, tone is borderline G11 material. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam Chzz ► 16:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete violation of WP:SOAP --Marianian (talk) 18:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.