Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedna (Database)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 20:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sedna (Database) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable, marketese without any reliable published secondary sources to indicate notability. Prod removed without adding reliable published secondary sources. -- Jeandré, 2007-08-28t20:51z
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TKD::Talk 08:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources are all over the place, the article just needs some work. — xDanielx T/C 08:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep With work, no ground for deletion. Dfrg.msc 10:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.