- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sefu Sun Da Fa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability issues have been noted before, but did not lead to an AfD. It looks to me that notability is self-claimed and, in any case, even if true, problematic. Delete. Nlu (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Triwbe (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Triwbe (talk) 12:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I find no sources meeting WP:RS to establish notability. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Only due to WP:V. There may be significant coverage out there, but not in English. --Triwbe (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. Looie496 (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V & WP:N. Eusebeus (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.