Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Segger Microcontroller Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Segger Microcontroller Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article is unverifiable with most edits coming from Info@segger-us.com, who is most likely an employee at Segger. WP:COI. The purpose of this article was to advertise Segger. Witchinghour 03:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Witchinghour 03:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Don't forget the copyright image Image:Segger165x71.gif as well. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 03:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - who eats spam anyway? /Blaxthos 16:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- STRONG keep - a deletion spree by a person who does not bother to do a minimal bqackground check. `'юзырь:mikka 19:28, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - actually it was other admins who said to me that I'm welcome to do an AfD. please see Talk:Segger Microcontroller Systems. --Witchinghour 19:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - also please take a minute to look at the histories of those pages thanks! --Witchinghour 19:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - also bear in mind that I am NOT an admin. I can't delete anything, all I can do is propose. Other multiple admins agreed with those proposals and deleted all those pages. but you are the only one who reinstated them!. --Witchinghour 20:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, I could only see one academic reference to the company; more reliable sources are needed. John Vandenberg 08:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.