Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Select Retail Holdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Superquinn. Merge/redirect that is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Select Retail Holdings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have doubts this company passes WP:COMPANY/GNG. There is some mentions in passing, generally routine press releases and their rewrites about the company's acquisitions, out of which Superquinn seems to have been the most significant, but I don't think it is a valid merge and redirect target. Then there is a bit coverage of their trouble, including the best piece I've found [1]. So, does anyone things this can be salvaged and pass NCOMPANY? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Superquinn. A WP:BEFORE search returns more than a little bit of coverage of this holding company/consortium. However all of it relates to its acquisition of Superquinn in 2005 and the sale of that asset (following receivership) to Musgraves in 2011. All of this could easily be covered in the Superquinn article. And, frankly, already is. WP:PRODUCT, WP:MERGEREASON and WP:CFORK all seem to apply. No need for a separate perma-stub on the holding company. Guliolopez (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Superquinn for the reasons given above that I don't feel the need to repeat. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Same - Merge/redirect to Superquinn for the reasons given above that I don't feel the need to repeat. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.