Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-declared art movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-declared art movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Near orphan about a questionable "art movement"; unreferenced since September 2006. kingboyk (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —Clubmarx (talk) 05:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. freshacconcispeaktome 12:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. - Modernist (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I don't think there's anything here that isn't self-explanatory: "a self-declared art movement is an art movement that is self-declared". Then it (long-windedly) says that declaring an art movement might not mean anything at all, so this is basically unhelpful article. At best, this is Merge or Redirect material to Art movement; if there are sources to explain this dilemma of What Exactly Constitutes an Art Movement, by all means, explain it on the main article. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.