- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sellsumerism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed by primary author (User:Christy Chung - I suspect a WP:SPA). Author seems to be using this to substantiate another article: Matt Garcia, which I believe should also be deleted. Per: WP:Neologism, WP:ADVERT. Jujutacular talkcontribs 21:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. Matt Garcia is also a highly suspicious one. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: there is no such a term.. South Bay (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable and disgusting neologism. Primary author history suggests this is part of a campaign. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism, seems to be promotional in intent. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Spam. Joe Chill (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.