- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. unverifiable; blatant misinformation Tikiwont (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Semosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little more than a WP:DICTDEF, and I can't find any evidence of it in google. Deprodded without supplying anything to help WP:V this thing. DMacks (talk) 02:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:HOAX - I can find no evidence of this being a real word. If it is a real word, delete per WP:NOTADICTIONARY, and for lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources (WP:N). - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Utter crap. DarkAudit (talk) 04:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Should have been deleted last semosh. JakeZ (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.