Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sencore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sencore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sencore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'd say this fails WP:A7 and could be CSD'd

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:A7 and WP:G11. Not a very active user (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete The article is an unambiguous copyright infringement and can be speedily deleted per WP:G12. The entire text of the article is from a press release. See http://www.sencore.com/company/blog/sencore-continues-expand-mrd-ag-6000-platform-recent-software-release for example, or https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Sencore Vexations (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:G11 and per WP:G12. Tagged for both. Hog Farm (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Couldn't find any non-neutral sources or non-press material to rewrite this article to meet our inclusion guidelines. All of you please read Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, specifically the section "Just pointing at a policy or guideline". Also read the criteria for speedy deletion, which says a page can only be speedy deleted if every revision of the article meets the criteria. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Ritchie333, that's a good point. Here are all the sources used in the article's history: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1602777,00.asp,

  http://www.pcworld.com/article/174270/how_we_test_hdtvs.html,

  http://www.sencore.com/about-us/index.php?id=8 (dead link),

  http://www.tvtechnology.com/nabshow/nab-show/95302 and

  https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1602777,00.asp Vexations (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Ten years of (article) life and little to indicate notability. Dorama285 00:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.