Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentimental value
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was transwiki to Wiktionary. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sentimental value (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Dictionary definition that fails WP:NOT; should be deleted or transwikied to Wiktionary. I don't see any reliable sources discussing the phrase (other than as a definition). Charlene 17:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Wiktionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it's an encyclopedia. Useight 17:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Wiktionary as per Useight Harlowraman 22:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki and delete per above, although I'm kind of surprised that there apparently aren't any sources of discussion. Propaniac 18:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Using the word and discussing it are different things. WP:NOTE requires that there be non-trivial discussions about the phrase as a phrase, since this article is about the phrase. --Charlene 18:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I'm surprised that there are no non-trivial sources about the phrase. I'm not doubting your investigation, just commenting that I would have thought there'd be an actual WP article on the phrase. Propaniac 19:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and do not transwiki. The term "sentimental value" does not merit a separate entry in two large paper dictionaries that I just checked. Shalom Hello 18:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please don't delete this article, it has so many memories... ~ Infrangible 01:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Seriously though, merge and redirect to Economic appraisal. Wl219 22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Wiktionary as per above. (But I love the remark by ~ Infrangible!)--Fabrictramp 22:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikitionary. Darrenhusted 21:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.