- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Soft delete. LFaraone 23:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Seomun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable school club/group. Completely bereft of third party sources, so it fails WP:GNG standard of notability. GrapedApe (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be one of many articles on run-of-the-mill model UN groups propped up by self-published sources. --BDD (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.