Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seperation of Powers & Checks and Balances Annotations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki. howcheng {chat} 21:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also Bicameralism Annotations (AfD discussion).

This appears to be original research. Delete. Move to Wikisource. JDoorjam 16:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• This is NOT original research, but is a sub-document of Article One of the United States Constitution, and is official annotation of Article One, Section 1 of the United States Constitution from Analysis and Interpretation of the Constitution : Annotations of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States : Senate Document No. 108-17 : 2002 Edition: Cases Decided to June 28, 2002

  Look at the What Links Here page.

  CORNELIUSSEON 16:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: previous entry by author of article. B.Wind 23:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • "What links here" doesn't really demonstrate anything. You were the one that added the hyperlinks pointing to this article. Uncle G 02:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• So, some people can link additional discussion to basic articles, and other people can't? Go look at the entire family of documents that makes up the US Constitution article in Wikipedia, and you will find a veritable rabbit warren of subordinate documents. CORNELIUSSEON 17:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to Wikisource if it is legal to do so, otherwise Delete as a copyvio. --FuriousFreddy 18:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this subdocument is moved to Wikisource, then I would expect all of the other subdocuments to articles on Wikipedia be moved to Wikisource as well.

    Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

    CORNELIUSSEON 20:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

    • Note: previous entry by author of article. B.Wind 23:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, they should. And go easy on the ruling lines, please. --FuriousFreddy 00:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral - if the article survives the AfD, it would help to have the correct spelling in its title. B.Wind 23:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the headsup. I'll correct the spelling if it does survive. CORNELIUSSEON 00:32, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Please note that Wikibooks already has The Annotated Constitution of the United States. Uncle G 03:01, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to Wikibooks: Per previous posting, move to The Annotated Constitution of the United States. DLJessup (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have copied the article text to wikibooks:United States Government/The Annotated Constitution of the United States/Article One, Section 1 Annotations and cleaned it up a little. — DLJessup (talk) 21:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.