Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepia Mutiny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result was Keep. — Caknuck 06:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sepia Mutiny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

• Delete - This page is nothing more than an advertisment for a blog, and does not belong in an Encylopedia. Padishah5000 16:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - WP:WEB states "content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." A quick google news search reveals three articles discussing posts or comments on the site itself; and not in random news outlets either, but the Los Angeles Times [1]; the Calcutta Telegraph [2] and Newsweek [3]. I could try a Lexis search, but what's the point? That alone seems to make the cutoff. Hornplease 20:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination incomplete, completed manually. Hornplease 07:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Hornplease 09:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; meets WP:WEB. John Vandenberg 09:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; notable in Indian American culture.Bakaman 23:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, should have more references incorporated, though. --Dhartung | Talk 08:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above, like it or not this meets WP:WEB guidelines. Burntsauce 23:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep SM is quite notable in Indian and Diaspora bologosphere. Amey Aryan DaBrood^© 18:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep famous indian american mag --D-Boy 18:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Wrong. RFerreira 06:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.