Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serial killers ink
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cool3 (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Serial killers ink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article created as clear COI/advertising attempt for website that does not meet notability requirements for an article. The closest thing to an independent, reliable source is a mention in a newspaper article that mentions them in the most extremely trivial way, everything else is MySpace and its own site. DreamGuy (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This website has phone calls and interviews with serial killers, I have not found any content such as that on other true crime websites. if you take the time and visit the site you will see that it's an excellent site for term papers and the like. i am only wanting the info out there instead relying on true crime sites that only post biographies. this website goes beyond biographies and talks to the killers themselves. I have removed the myspace link. please let me know your thoughts. I feel this website should be included on wikipedia due to its close contact with real serial killers, via interviews and phone conversations posted on the website. i find it a good site for term papers and the like. there is no other site on the internet with actual phone call recordings and i feel this site is stand alone. The site is notable due to the direct contact with convicted serial killers as well the site sells murderabilia which is a very heated topic at present due to several states moving to enact anti murderabilia legislation.Darbiedoll78 (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Promotional article for a non notable site. Triplestop (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't look particularly notable. The Guardian reference is a brief mention not indicating anything very special. All the other ghits I've found appear to be MySpace, and other blog type stuff. Peridon (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable momoricks 05:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines as per WP:WEB. ERK talk 07:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.Reads like an advertisement for the site and fails notability policies. --CrohnieGalTalk 09:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam for a non notable site. Laurent (talk) 11:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is Spam and the user who wrote KEEP is really site runner Eric Gein. This website is commercial and should be deleted from Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skinkbegone (talk • contribs) 21:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.