Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serial organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Serial organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced dictionary-like entry on a seemingly vague topic. Pnm (talk) 21:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Serial organization is relevant in many different areas but the details are specific to the topic and renders this article a dictionary definition. Any expansion would be best served as part of the specific topic. For example, writing about serial organisation in the congitive sciences is different from serial orgnisation in biology. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 15:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.