Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seriously, It's a Problem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, It's a Problem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unpublished book; fails WP:N. (No speedy deletion criteria.) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Revolution1221 (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons above. Uberaccount (talk) 21:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this is speedy surely? Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails everything. Perhaps "books" or even "products or services" could be added to CSD A7... --Randykitty (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is pretty much the book equivalent of WP:GARAGE. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 01:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As far as speedy goes, there's nothing in here that would qualify it for anything. It's not overtly promotional, nor does it lack context. The book is non-notable, as there's not even a whisper out there about this book in any place other than this Wikipedia page. If it gets published and gains notability, it can be re-added- but not before then. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.