- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, hard to verify, self-admitted neologism. A google search for servatism returns lots of links, but for the most part they seem to refer to "con- [line break] servatism". A search for servatism -con returns only 356, mostly WP mirrors and plays on "conservatism" ("Kahn-servatism"). A search on JSTOR suffers from the same problems. So I'd say the article needs to be sourced to establish current usage or be deleted. ~ trialsanderrors 09:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 10:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism with no sources provided to verify word is in use. --Metropolitan90 16:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.