Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sesis

Previously speedy deleted, subsequently recreated. Possible hoax. To afd for review. — ERcheck (talk) 03:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - even if real, not enough information for a useful article. JohnCD (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Has all the hallmarks of a hoax. It is vague and unreferenced. It claims coverage by a RS but in such a way as to be unverifiable. Googling Sesis microsoft or Sesis microsoft hardware gives the article as the third and first hits respectively and shows nothing that corroborates the article. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources given to verify info and my attempts to find somee.g. on Google failed to come up with anything relevant. Qwfp (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per nom. AndreNatas (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, it smells like a hoax. By the way, Sesis is a name in the First Book of Esdras; he is one of the sons of Ozoras (as if that were helpful). Michael Kinyon (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt per nom. RogueNinja_talk 19:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as although I was able to improve the article's grammar, I was unable to find sources. Sincerley, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 22:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.