- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was A7ed. - Mailer Diablo 12:32, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This vanity article has been wiped and degenerated into a debate between wikipedians. Draeco 17:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity article to begin with, and general stupidness to follow. --Fang Aili 18:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete nn-bio --MisterHand 18:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete with extreme prejudice. With text like that he's just begging for this. Daniel Case 18:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete was nn-bio, now no content (ESkog)(Talk) 18:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Nuke with sanction. The conversationalists can use instant messaging like the rest of us. B.Wind 20:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I have tagged the article for speedy. Chris the speller 21:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete , take your pick: {{nn-bio}}, {{nocontent}}, {{nonsense}}... Jamie (talk/contribs) 22:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Tis speedied. Deltabeignet 23:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.