- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seth neiman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article subject has some degree of third party mention, but is it sufficient to pass notability as per WP:BIO? Pianotech 11:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep has driven in several professional series and races, including the American Le Mans Series and 24 Hours of Le Mans. Passes WP:NSPORT/Motorsports I've re-written and cited the article. -Drdisque (talk) 21:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. - I really hate crappy articles like this. The first sentence of the lead is a fragment... That said, the bar for sports inclusion is low and I can't get worked up about needing to delete this, which might be of interest to hardcore racing fans. You'll notice that I'm applying "the rule of reason" rather than checking the internet for validation according to established notability doctrine... Carrite (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.